The University of Roehampton warned undergraduates taking a module on medieval and Renaissance gods and heroes they will find 'images of nudity' in The Birth of Venus.
0
Okay, so I need to create a concise summary of the provided text without any additional commentary. The text is from the Daily Mail Online and discusses a university issuing a trigger warning for Botticelli's artwork.
First, I'll read through the text to understand the main points. The key elements are the University of Roehampton warning students about nudity in Botticelli's paintings, the public and expert reactions, and the broader context of trigger warnings in academia.
I should identify the essential details: who (the university), what (warning about nudity in Botticelli's art), when (current event), where (Roehampton), why (to prepare students), and how (via a module on medieval and Renaissance art). Also, include reactions from critics like Terry Gilliam and Artwatch UK.
I'll structure the summary to include the warning, the artworks mentioned (The Birth of Venus and Primavera), the university's reasoning, and the backlash. I need to keep it brief, sticking to the facts without personal opinions.
I should avoid including unrelated news items or additional stories mentioned in the text. The focus should solely be on the trigger warning incident and its implications.
The University of Roehampton has issued a trigger warning to students in a medieval and Renaissance art module, alerting them to "some images of nudity" in Botticelli's *The Birth of Venus* and *Primavera*. This move has sparked criticism, with figures like Terry Gilliam and Artwatch UK's Michael Daley deeming it excessive. The university defends the warning as part of its commitment to transparency and student choice.
