1 week ago Assessing the U.S. Article 51 Letter for the Attack on Iran: Legal Lipstick on the Use of Force Pig

Assessing the U.S. Article 51 Letter for the Attack on Iran: Legal Lipstick on the Use of Force Pig  Just Security

Events

2 w. ago Breitbart Business Digest: The Supreme Court Just Torpedoed the Legal War on Tariffs

The Supreme Court’s decision on Friday in FCC v. Consumers’ Research didn’t just preserve a telecom subsidy—it delivered a serious setback to efforts to dismantle President Trump’s trade agenda. The post Breitbart Business Digest: The Supreme Court Just Torpedoed the Legal War on Tariffs appeared first on Breitbart.

Events

3 w. ago Are we legally at war with Iran? A constitutional expert explains presidential and congressional war powers

Are we legally at war with Iran? A constitutional expert explains presidential and congressional war powers  Northeastern Global News

Politics

3 w. ago Is the US legally at war with Iran? A legal scholar explains presidential and congressional war powers

Is the US legally at war with Iran? A legal scholar explains presidential and congressional war powers  Northeastern Global News

Politics

3 w. ago Trump’s Strikes on Iran Were Unlawful. Here’s Why That Matters.

Trump’s unlawful strikes on Iran have laid bare the absence of any effective legal constraints on a U.S. president to use deadly force in the world.

Politics

3 w. ago GREGG JARRETT: Why Trump's preemptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities was legal, likely saved lives

Trump's strikes on Iranian nuclear sites were legally authorized under the 2001 AUMF, which granted presidents power to target nations that aided 9/11 terrorists

Events

3 w. ago Trump weighs military action against Iran amid mounting legal concerns

Trump's remarks on Iran have sparked new fears of escalation, retaliation, and long-term engagement overseas— some have also questioned their legality.

Politics